Revenue is up. Take‑home isn’t.
You’re winning more retainers than ever. The team is working harder than ever. And somehow the bank account is tighter than last year. That’s not a sales problem. It’s the same financial pattern I see in every agency that scales without an operating system underneath it — scope creep eating delivery time, retainers priced before you understood your real cost, and three to five clients you should have fired six months ago.
For US‑based marketing agencies doing $1M–$20M in revenue.
same revenue
Trusted by growing service businesses
Revenue is up 32%. Take‑home is down 18%. Both numbers are true.
A $3M agency at 45% gross margin keeps $1.35M to cover everything else. After 22% S&M and 28% G&A, you’re at −5% operating margin. Run it at 60/15/15 instead and that same $3M throws off $900K to the bottom line. Same revenue. Same roster. The COGS leak is almost always three things compounding.
Unbilled work nobody tracks
“Just one more revision.” A second logo concept. A quick analytics report. Across a year of retainers, that’s typically 5–15% of margin disappearing — often $15K of free work per client per year.
Win rates above 70%
If you’re winning more than 70% of proposals, your prices are too low. Above 80% is seriously underpriced. Most agencies leave a 25–40% margin uplift on the table because they confuse “we’re winning” with “we’re priced right.”
Clients you should have fired
20–30% of agency clients run at negative or marginal contribution margin once delivery hours, account management, and senior creative time get loaded in. Fire the bottom 20% by profitability and GM jumps 8–12 points in a quarter.
The gap between revenue and take‑home.
In agencies, COGS is where 80% of the leak lives.
Most owners think their cost problem is overhead. It usually isn’t — it’s gross margin. Healthy GM for an agency at $1M–$20M is 60%. Most agencies I look at are running 40–50%. The 10–20 point gap shows up in three diagnostic levers, in this fixed order.
The fix is mechanical. In a fixed order.
COGS first, S&M second, G&A third. Never reordered. For agencies, the COGS leak is almost always three things compounding — and each lever has a known fix and a known dollar impact.
Scope creep that nobody tracks or charges for
The fix isn’t being inflexible. It’s defining scope tightly upfront, building a small buffer into the retainer for ad‑hoc requests, and triggering a formal change order for anything beyond that. The clients who push back hardest on scope discipline are usually the ones costing you the most.
Pricing that hasn’t been re‑run in two years
Increase prices on your next five proposals by 15–20%. Track the win rate. If it stays above 60%, increase again. The discomfort of losing some pitches on price means you’re in the right range. Most agencies win 75–85% of proposals and feel great about it. They shouldn’t.
Clients you should have fired six months ago
The number you need is gross margin per client per month. Most agencies don’t have it because time tracking is loose and senior team time gets blended into “overhead.” Once you see it, the action is obvious — fire the bottom 20%, reinvest the freed capacity into the top 20%, and watch GM jump 8–12 points in a single quarter.
Most agency owners are running three jobs at once.
If you took 90 days off — no calls, no emails, no decisions — what happens? In most agencies I look at, three things break: the biggest clients call asking for you specifically because the relationship is with you, not the firm. New business stalls because you’re the closer. Strategic creative direction grinds because you’re the senior brain on every brand.
That’s not an agency. It’s a freelance practice with a logo. Practices sell at 2–3x EBITDA — buying a job. Agencies that run independently with documented systems, delegated client relationships, and a senior team that ships without you sell at 5–6x. Same earnings. Different multiple. On an agency doing $500K in EBITDA, that’s the difference between a $1.4M sale and a $3M sale.
The fix is what I call “firing yourself” — not retiring, but building the agency so it doesn’t need you in three places at once: delivery, sales, and senior client relationships. It’s a 12–18 month process and it’s the single biggest enterprise value lever any service business has.
This is also why “we just need more revenue” is the wrong answer. Bigger numbers in a more dependent agency don’t move the multiple. They just make the cash crunch louder.
See where your agency sits against 60/15/15.
I’ll work through your rough numbers — revenue, gross margin, win rate, retainer count, owner comp — and show you the top 3–5 leaks with dollar ranges. No documents, no prep. You keep the Leak Map either way. 15 spots per month.
What this looks like in real businesses.
Motiv Marketing
Same earnings. Different multiple.
On an agency doing $500K in EBITDA, the difference between a founder‑dependent practice and an agency that runs without you is the difference between a $1.4M sale and a $3M sale. Bigger revenue in a more dependent agency doesn’t move the multiple — it just makes the cash crunch louder.
Find out where your agency margin is leaking.
Most agencies in the $1M–$20M band have $50K–$300K of profit and tax leaks hiding in scope creep, retainer pricing, client profitability, and entity setup. The Leak Check finds them. We work through your rough numbers and produce a 1‑page Leak Map: top 3–5 leaks with dollar ranges, ranked by 12‑month impact. 15 spots per month.
For US‑based marketing agencies doing $1M–$20M in revenue.
Questions about Fractional CFO for Marketing Agencies.
Clear answers to the questions owners ask before deciding what to do next.